Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost/handle/Hannan/421767
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGlass, R Len_US
dc.date2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T12:14:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-18T12:14:21Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4786961en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/396375en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/421767-
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.description.abstractThe issue of research rigor versus relevance has been bandied about in the halls of computing for several decades now. This issue is about trying to ensure that research is not only rigorous, a goal we all support but also relevant to practice, a goal that at least practitioners support wholeheartedly. To address this issue, Michael Rosemann and Iris Vessey recently published an interesting proposal ("Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks," MIS Quarterly, Mar. 2008, pp. 1-22). This paper focuses on their proposal because computing and software people seldom read the IS literature and thus are likely unaware of it. The proposal is astonishingly simple yet potentially powerful.en_US
dc.relation.haspartAL418800.pdfen_US
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.other10.1109/MS.2002.1032872en_US
dc.titleLoyal Oppositionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journal.titleIEEE Softwareen_US
Appears in Collections:2002-2008

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
AL418800.pdf214.27 kBAdobe PDF
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGlass, R Len_US
dc.date2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T12:14:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-18T12:14:21Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4786961en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/396375en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/421767-
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.description.abstractThe issue of research rigor versus relevance has been bandied about in the halls of computing for several decades now. This issue is about trying to ensure that research is not only rigorous, a goal we all support but also relevant to practice, a goal that at least practitioners support wholeheartedly. To address this issue, Michael Rosemann and Iris Vessey recently published an interesting proposal ("Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks," MIS Quarterly, Mar. 2008, pp. 1-22). This paper focuses on their proposal because computing and software people seldom read the IS literature and thus are likely unaware of it. The proposal is astonishingly simple yet potentially powerful.en_US
dc.relation.haspartAL418800.pdfen_US
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.other10.1109/MS.2002.1032872en_US
dc.titleLoyal Oppositionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journal.titleIEEE Softwareen_US
Appears in Collections:2002-2008

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
AL418800.pdf214.27 kBAdobe PDF
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGlass, R Len_US
dc.date2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T12:14:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-18T12:14:21Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4786961en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/396375en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/421767-
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.description.abstractThe issue of research rigor versus relevance has been bandied about in the halls of computing for several decades now. This issue is about trying to ensure that research is not only rigorous, a goal we all support but also relevant to practice, a goal that at least practitioners support wholeheartedly. To address this issue, Michael Rosemann and Iris Vessey recently published an interesting proposal ("Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks," MIS Quarterly, Mar. 2008, pp. 1-22). This paper focuses on their proposal because computing and software people seldom read the IS literature and thus are likely unaware of it. The proposal is astonishingly simple yet potentially powerful.en_US
dc.relation.haspartAL418800.pdfen_US
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subject.other10.1109/MS.2002.1032872en_US
dc.titleLoyal Oppositionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journal.titleIEEE Softwareen_US
Appears in Collections:2002-2008

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
AL418800.pdf214.27 kBAdobe PDF