Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost/handle/Hannan/642766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHao Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorFang Zhuoen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeng Wangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T10:06:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-20T10:06:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-6777en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-6785en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1109/JESTPE.2015.2475171en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/176023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/642766-
dc.description.abstractResonant controller is considered ideal for harmonics current control, with advantages of zero steady-state error and computation efficiency. The commonly employed proportional-resonant (PR) controller is widely accepted, but its limited ability in dealing with higher order harmonics, or named limited regulation bandwidth, is also recognized from practical applications. This paper points out that regulation bandwidth of resonant controller is related to the overshoot peaks around resonant frequency in the current loop. The overshoot peaks are caused by open-loop phase lag around resonant frequency, which comes from delay link and R-L plant. The phase lag from delay link could be canceled by the proposed delay-compensated forms for both PR and vector resonant (VR) controller; but toward phase lag from R-L plant, the two types resonant controller perform different: PR controller does not give full consideration about R-L plant, leading to inherent obvious overshoot peaks in current loop, whereas VR controller provides proper leading phase to cancel the phase lag from R-L plant, greatly reducing the overshoot peaks and promising wider regulation bandwidth. The comparisons and analysis reveal the principle and relations of PR and VR controllers, which help to deepen the understanding for further improving the resonant controller.en_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.haspart7230245.pdfen_US
dc.subjectovershoot peaks|resonant controller|regulation bandwidth|delay compensationen_US
dc.titleAnalysis About Overshoot Peaks Appearing in the Current Loop With Resonant Controlleren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journal.volume4en_US
dc.journal.issue1en_US
dc.journal.titleIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronicsen_US
Appears in Collections:2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7230245.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Preview File
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHao Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorFang Zhuoen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeng Wangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T10:06:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-20T10:06:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-6777en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-6785en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1109/JESTPE.2015.2475171en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/176023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/642766-
dc.description.abstractResonant controller is considered ideal for harmonics current control, with advantages of zero steady-state error and computation efficiency. The commonly employed proportional-resonant (PR) controller is widely accepted, but its limited ability in dealing with higher order harmonics, or named limited regulation bandwidth, is also recognized from practical applications. This paper points out that regulation bandwidth of resonant controller is related to the overshoot peaks around resonant frequency in the current loop. The overshoot peaks are caused by open-loop phase lag around resonant frequency, which comes from delay link and R-L plant. The phase lag from delay link could be canceled by the proposed delay-compensated forms for both PR and vector resonant (VR) controller; but toward phase lag from R-L plant, the two types resonant controller perform different: PR controller does not give full consideration about R-L plant, leading to inherent obvious overshoot peaks in current loop, whereas VR controller provides proper leading phase to cancel the phase lag from R-L plant, greatly reducing the overshoot peaks and promising wider regulation bandwidth. The comparisons and analysis reveal the principle and relations of PR and VR controllers, which help to deepen the understanding for further improving the resonant controller.en_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.haspart7230245.pdfen_US
dc.subjectovershoot peaks|resonant controller|regulation bandwidth|delay compensationen_US
dc.titleAnalysis About Overshoot Peaks Appearing in the Current Loop With Resonant Controlleren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journal.volume4en_US
dc.journal.issue1en_US
dc.journal.titleIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronicsen_US
Appears in Collections:2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7230245.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Preview File
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHao Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorFang Zhuoen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeng Wangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T10:06:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-20T10:06:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-6777en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-6785en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1109/JESTPE.2015.2475171en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/176023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/642766-
dc.description.abstractResonant controller is considered ideal for harmonics current control, with advantages of zero steady-state error and computation efficiency. The commonly employed proportional-resonant (PR) controller is widely accepted, but its limited ability in dealing with higher order harmonics, or named limited regulation bandwidth, is also recognized from practical applications. This paper points out that regulation bandwidth of resonant controller is related to the overshoot peaks around resonant frequency in the current loop. The overshoot peaks are caused by open-loop phase lag around resonant frequency, which comes from delay link and R-L plant. The phase lag from delay link could be canceled by the proposed delay-compensated forms for both PR and vector resonant (VR) controller; but toward phase lag from R-L plant, the two types resonant controller perform different: PR controller does not give full consideration about R-L plant, leading to inherent obvious overshoot peaks in current loop, whereas VR controller provides proper leading phase to cancel the phase lag from R-L plant, greatly reducing the overshoot peaks and promising wider regulation bandwidth. The comparisons and analysis reveal the principle and relations of PR and VR controllers, which help to deepen the understanding for further improving the resonant controller.en_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.haspart7230245.pdfen_US
dc.subjectovershoot peaks|resonant controller|regulation bandwidth|delay compensationen_US
dc.titleAnalysis About Overshoot Peaks Appearing in the Current Loop With Resonant Controlleren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journal.volume4en_US
dc.journal.issue1en_US
dc.journal.titleIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronicsen_US
Appears in Collections:2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7230245.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Preview File